Authors

Diane J. Kim

Type

Text

Type

Dissertation

Advisor

Anderson, Brenda J. | Leung, Hoi-Chung | Lobel, Marci | Kotov, Roman.

Date

2015-08-01

Keywords

adaptation, aggression, defense, psychological stress, unpredictable threat, working memory | Psychobiology

Department

Department of Biopsychology.

Language

en_US

Source

This work is sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate School in compliance with the requirements for completion of degree.

Identifier

http://hdl.handle.net/11401/77012

Publisher

The Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.

Format

application/pdf

Abstract

In humans, stressors are often psychological and anticipatory in nature rather than directly harmful. In order to understand the consequences of chronic psychological stress and behavioral adaptations to repeated unpredictable threats, an ethologically relevant rodent model was developed that included the anticipation of a predator attack but without direct harm. In the unpredictable threat stress condition, rats faced risk while seeking resources through a tunnel over a three week period. When rats cross the tunnel, they were presented with random (p=0.25), simultaneous presentations of predator odor, flashing LEDs, and an abrupt auditory stimulus. The control group was housed in identical tunnels but never experienced threat stimuli. The aims of the study were the following: (1) to quantitatively test the effectiveness of the stimuli and the duration with which they remain effective over repeated presentations, (2) to further test whether the stimuli were perceived as threats of harm by measuring the frequency of behaviors known to be elicited in the face of predators, (3) to test for adaptations in direct defensive responses as well as behaviors with predictive validity for symptoms of anxiety and depression, (4) to test for changes in cognitive behavior with a standard rodent test of spatial working memory, and (5) to identify candidate sites of plasticity by metabolic factors that indirectly reflect rates of neural activity. While in the manipulation, foraging was reduced but there were no differences in food/water consumption and weight gain indicating no significant challenges to homeostasis. The stress group produced significantly more risk assessment behaviors than the control group confirming the aversive nature of the stimuli. After removal from the stress manipulation, the stress group exhibited greater defensive responding consistent with threat-related vigilance and hyper-reactivity, both of which would be expected to increase an organism's survival in high threat environments. There were no changes in passive avoidance or behavioral symptoms of depression. Metabolic changes were observed in brain regions associated with threat, which included the dorsal premammillary nucleus of the hypothalamus, a critical region in response to predator. Repeated exposure to threat over three weeks enhanced defense behaviors tested in high arousal conditions, but at the expense of spatial working memory tested in neutral test conditions. These shifts in behavior may be adaptive in unpredictable, high threat environments but may be maladaptive in safe environments. | 157 pages

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.