"A general assessment of selected dredging--disposal options for three " by Nicole Justine Bubolo and J.R. Schubel
 

Type

Text

Date

1980

Language

en_US

Subject

Chesapeake Bay Program (U.S.),Dredging--Chesapeake Bay (Md. and Va.)--Waste disposal | Chesapeake Bay (Md. and Va.)

Identifier

http://hdl.handle.net/11401/66151

Contributor

Marine Sciences Research Center

Creator

Bubolo, Nicole Justine | Schubel, J.R.

Publisher

Stony Brook, NY | Marine Sciences Research Center, Stony Brook University

Format

application/pdf

Description

xv, 206 p. : maps ; 28 cm. From the conclusions and recommendations, ". . .Based on our evaluation of existing data on environmental effects we rank the five disposal alternatives in the following order of decreasing acceptability: (1) hydraulic dredging and pipeline disposal in confined submerged locations adjacent to Harbor channels, (2) overboard disposal adjacent to Harbor channels in unconfined locations, (3) marsh creation, (4) island construction, (5) upland disposal. . .

Relation

Special report (State University of New York at Stony Brook. Marine Sciences Research Center);40

Rights

Stony Brook University

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.