Authors

Jun Wu

Type

Text

Type

Dissertation

Advisor

Samulyak, Roman | Jahangir S. Rastegar | Yu Zhou | Venkat N. Krovi.

Date

2010-12-01

Keywords

Mechanical Engineering | CAD/CAM, Geometric Constraint, Kinematics, Mechanism Design

Department

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Language

en_US

Source

This work is sponsored by the Stony Brook University Graduate School in compliance with the requirements for completion of degree.

Identifier

http://hdl.handle.net/11401/72710

Publisher

The Graduate School, Stony Brook University: Stony Brook, NY.

Format

application/pdf

Abstract

This dissertation deals with the problem of task centered design of mechanisms and robotic systems via novel concept of variational kinematic geometry. The results can be extended to other field such as biomechanics, structure chemistry and protein kinematics, as well as micro- and nano- systems, in which kinematics playsan important roles. Since the early days of Industrial Revolution, machine theorists and kinematicians have sought to develop a theory to analyze and synthesize mechanisms so that engineers could approach the problem in a rational way. This dissertation introduces a task-centered approach to mechanism design using a constraint basedparadigm, and conducts a comparative study on the kinematic and the geometric constraints of the motion.Kinematic-constraint based synthesis approach, derived from the classical viewpoint that a kinematic mechanism is a collection of kinematic links connected with kinematic pairs (or joints), deals with the determination of mechanism types (type synthesis) and/or their link dimensions (dimensional synthesis). Hence, this approachis referred to as two-step-based mechanism-centric design paradigm.This dissertation advocates a geometric-constraint based approach. Following this approach, a designer would focus on the analysis of point (or line) trajectories associated with the motion, the goal of which is to obtain a trajectory that can be constructed as a geometric condition or constraint that best describes the motion.Typically this is done in a geometric constraint identification and acquisition process, i.e. | by comparing various trajectories of a specified motion with known constraints from a library of mechanically realizable constraints. The resulting feasibleconstraints can be used directly for the simultaneous type and dimensional synthesis of a physical device such as mechanical linkage that generates the specified motion task. This effectively reduces the problem of mechanism synthesis to that of constraint identification and acquisition and thus bridges the gap betweentype and dimensional synthesis. Furthermore, as a mechanism is defined by a combination of geometric constraints, the geometric-constraint based approach reduces the complexity in type synthesis significantly. This approach to motion modeling has similarity to constraint based shape modeling in Variational Geometry and istherefore referred to as Variational Kinematic Geometry.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.